Sunday, June 24, 2018

Congratulations Kids!

Last night, I had the privilege of walking my daughter down the aisle at a small, intimate ceremony in Las Vegas, where the bride and groom were surrounded by family and close friends.  I have many, many thoughts, and I'm having a hard time sorting them all out, so I'm just going to write stuff down as it comes to mind, and skip the eloquence...

Kid, I'm happy for you and Josh beyond words.  No ifs, no ands, no buts... just happy for you.

The happy family is moving to Reno next week.  A lot of people have asked me if I'm going to miss them... if I'm going to be sad.  Of course I'm going to miss them, but how could I possibly be sad?  My daughter is moving because she wants to see something beyond where she grew up.  This new family is doing exactly what young families do.  How could I feel anything but happiness for them.

The wedding itself was one in a series of events this week... they zip lined Fremont St.  They're riding their motorcycles to their new home, stopping in national parks on the way.  And they planned and executed all of this without any assistance...and they took mishaps in stride... even when Josh's bike died and he had to buy a new one.

I realize that you're going to have disagreements, trials and struggles, but know I'm confident that you can -- and will -- get through them and that your marriage will grow stronger and more loving with the passage of time.

If you need something... advice... help... just to say hi... I'm a phone call away.

Congratulations.  I love you.


Friday, February 23, 2018

My Two Cents on the Florida Shooting

Let me start by saying that what pisses me off most about this whole scene is that those on the left and those on the right are so busy screaming and defending their precious positions that rational voices are being lost in the din.  It's bad enough that these events occur.  It's even worse that they occur so frequently.  Worse yet is the fact that we, as Americans, are growing numb from hearing about it all the time.  The worst part of all is that we agree there's a problem, but we're so cock-sure that our opinion is the right one that we dig in and refuse to listen to another position.  All the while, knowing that another mass shooting is in the not-too-distant future.

I've seen pro-gun advocates scream that it's wrong to blame the tool (the gun) for the actions of the person wielding the tool.  You know what?  They're right.

I've seen gun control advocates scream that (insert mass shooting incident here) wouldn't have occurred if the gun hadn't fallen into the perpetrator's hands.  You know what?  They're right.

You idiots on both sides need to get over your personal agenda.  You ALL need to SHUT THE FUCK UP and take a step back.  This issue isn't about you!  This issue isn't about how right you are, or how wrong the other side is.  I think that we all agree that there is too much gun violence in America.  I think we all agree that it needs to change.  Maybe it's time to quit shouting your self-serving rhetoric, and focus on the issue.

I saw kids walk out of classrooms to protest the violence.  I saw kids standing up and saying enough is enough!  To my dismay, about half of the alleged adults chastised these same kids for getting angry, and voicing their fears in the only way they know how.  These kids were belittled as the Tide Pod generation.  Okay, yeah, there are a few idiots eating Tide Pods, but that doesn't mean the this generation's fears are unwarranted, nor does it render moot their legitimate right to call us out for our infighting and failure to act.

THESE ARE OUR FUCKING KIDS AND GRANDKIDS, YOU FUCKING IDIOTS!!  But you're so busy squabbling about how to solve the problem that you've lost sight of the root issue!  Our kids are killing each other.  It doesn't matter whether it's in the Chicago hood, or the whitest suburb, the fact is that we're screaming at each other over the approach, and the root issue is being completely ignored.

We're supposed to be the adults here!  Let's fucking grow up and act like it!

Wednesday, January 31, 2018

My Take on the 2018 State of the Union Address

Last night I watched President Trump deliver his first State of the Union address.  Like many viewers, I also showed up early to watch the "pregame" show, and watched Joe Kennedy deliver the Democratic Response to Trump's address.  Here are some of my thoughts about the events, in no particular order.

-I checked out all of the major networks before the show, and for the most part I was disappointed in the amount of spin that the commentators put on things.  Fox, as usual, were behaving like Trump's cheerleaders, and the other outlets were significantly less kind.  I finally settled on CBS, because their views seemed the least  biased.

-I was pleasantly surprised by Trump's speech.  It was significantly more conciliatory and positive than I expected, and far less self-congratulating than I anticipated.  I knew there would be exaggerations, but the speech didn't scream "liar, liar!"

-I was struck by how much Trump basked in the applause.  Indeed, he seemed to prompt it several times.  I was disgusted by how the Republicans looked like a bunch of yes-men, and how the Democrats sat stone-faced, even when Trump made comments that could have been bipartisan.  The Republicans looked like sycophant lap dogs.  The Democrats looked (and occasionally sounded)  uncooperative and obstructionist.  It was unprofessional on both sides.  I was particularly disgusted with Nancy Pelosi's dour demeanor.

-I was genuinely impressed with Kennedy.  I think this kid has a future.  He seemed passionate and genuinely moved during his response.

Overall, I suspect that the event did what it was supposed to do... it mellowed my harsh opinion of Trump, and it made me more acutely aware of Kennedy and left me with a generally positive impression of him.  It utterly failed to reduce my contempt for Congress.  I'm still skeptical that Trump will change his ways, and I'm not a Kennedy fanboy, because I haven't yet researched his record.  But I walked away from the State of the Union speeches feeling less angry than I've felt in a long time.

Friday, December 29, 2017

My Problem With Palestine

I've spent a lot of time pondering the Palestinian-Israeli problem over the years.  I certainly don't believe that I can fix the problem single-handedly, but I would like to put out a couple of items that the public at large doesn't seem to know or consider when the issue is discussed.

You may or may not know that the Palestinians effectively lost their land because of the six day war in 1967.  In a nutshell, Israel's neighbors had a problem with Israel's existence since the country was re-created in 1948.  These neighboring countries (Egypt, Jordan and Syria) tried a couple of times since 1948 to kick Israel's ass, and consistently failed.  In 1967, this happened again, and in a matter of six days, Israel took an ass load of land from these countries.  In short, the Palestinians tried to take something from Israel, and the Israelis eradicated Palestine from the map.  My take:  If you go to war with a country and lose, you really don't have much to cry about, especially if you're the aggressor!

Going back further, there has never been a historical country of Palestine.  There have been Palestinian territories going back to the Roman Empire, but there has never been a country named Palestine in the same sense that there has been a France, Britain, China or USA.  This means that the Palestinians are more of a cultural people than a geographic people.

If you put these issues together, it seems to me that the Palestinians are being rather unreasonable in their demands for land and peace.  They claim a right to East Jerusalem, though they've never had a country, much less a country with Jerusalem as its capital.  They claim land that they lost through their own misplaced aggression.  It seems to me that life would be easier for everyone if they took what was offered and moved forward peacefully.

This, of course, is my own take.  I am absolutely willing to hear new information.  I don't have all the answers, and welcome the opportunity for someone to prove me wrong, or change my mind.

Thursday, December 28, 2017

Libertarians are Leading With the Wrong Argument

Those of you who know me are likely aware that I'm a Libertarian and have been one for... well, quite a while. Over the years, I've heard time and time again that Taxation is Theft.  It's become kind of a rallying cry for the Libertarian party.  Unfortunately, it's the wrong opening discussion.  Here's why:

The reason I became a Libertarian was not because of money.  I became a Libertarian because I was disillusioned with the Democrats and Republicans.  I got tired of the lies, the broken promises, the crony capitalism and backroom deals.  I grew sick of seeing politicians getting elected to office as decent people only to be turned into party automatons.  I got tired of seeing new laws that curtailed my personal rights.

Bitching about taxation is all well and good.  I don't know anyone who loves paying taxes.  But at the end of the day, choosing taxation as the Meme for the Libertarian Party is not the best place to start the discussion. Taxation is a finite item with a limited appeal and value.  We should talk about how our individual freedoms are being eroded.  People seem to agree that freedom has no price.  So why are we leading with taxation, which has a set dollar value, when we can talk about personal freedom, which has a value beyond measure?  Libertarians are leading with the wrong argument.

Monday, September 11, 2017

Protect Our Private Information

I'm sure that you've heard about the Equifax breach.  I don't know about you, but I'm tired of the haphazard, lazy securing of our private data.  Corporate America has proven that self-policing doesn't work, so it's time to get the Government involved.  I will be writing a letter to my legislators at the state and national level, and I encourage you to do the same.  For your convenience, I am including the text that I will be sending in.  Feel free to copy and paste, and send to your own elected officials.

I am writing to express my anger and dismay over the Equifax data breach.  I am tired of not having my personal, private data properly secured.  Government and private entities have repeatedly demonstrated a lack of convern over my financial data and proven that self-policing is not a sufficient deterrant.  With this in mind, I am asking for legislation designed to provide intentives to keep personal data personal, and to punish those who fail to do so.  My proposed legislation is two-pronged.

First and foremost, there must be a real, tangible financial penalty for those who fail to protect customer data.  Companies who fail to protect such data should be prohibited from forcing customers into arbitration. This will allow victims of sloppy security the opportunity to be better compensated for lost time and money.  Companies who fail to protect private data will also be forced to provide lifetime credit monitoring and fraud assistance for anyone whose data was compromised, whether or not an actual loss occurred.  The idea is that it should be the company's responsibility to make things right when a data breach occurs, not the consumer's.  This means that if a company fails to keep my data secure, they are on the hook for all expenses incurred as a result, permanently.  Attorney fees, lost time, damage to credit, damage to reputation, and direct or indirect financial loss should all be subject to this law.  If, when you consider the wording of this legislation, you need to choose between erring on the side of the company, or err on the side of the consumer, you must err on the side of the consumer.

My second proposal is aimed at the Credit Reporting Agencies.  I propose legislation that requires Credit Reporting Agencies to allow all consumers to lock and unlock their private credit information at will, at no cost to the individual.  While consumers have a choice whether or not to carry credit cards, and when to use credit, we do not have a choice regarding whether or not our data is submitted to the Credit Reporting Agencies.  We have neither the right, nor the choice to opt out.  Adding insult to injury, we are usually required to pay for the privilege of preventing third parties from accessing our data, and if we do choose to pay to keep our data private, we need to pay again so that potential creditors and employers can access this data.  This is OUR private information, and the Credit Reporting Agencies are charging us to keep it private.

Thank you for your consideration in this important matter.

For your convenience, I am also including a link that will help you find your elected officials.

Monday, September 4, 2017

Questions for Libertarians

Those of you who know me realize that I consider myself a liberal-leaning Libertarian.  In general, I believe that the government is too large, too intrusive, and too wasteful.  At the same time, I see just as many signs of capitalism running amok, taking advantage of the little guy to the same extent as government.  Trusting the market is well and good, as long as you realize that market efficiency and human compassion are often-times mutually exclusive.  I'd like to bring up a couple of points here, and ask my fellow Libertarians how they see these issues, and how they would solve them.

Let me start with the topic of income inequality.  I'm fairly confident that we can all agree that income inequality exists in America.  We most certainly agree that income inequality drives economic productivity, because people desire to get ahead in life.  The thing is, the deck is heavily stacked against the little guy.  Statistics show that the wealthiest 1% of America holds approximately 40% of all wealth.  Conversely, the bottom 20% holds less than 1% of the wealth, and statistics indicate that this income inequality is only accelerating.  The middle class, which historians and economists consider critical to a prosperous, stable society, is rapidly shrinking.  I suspect that my Libertarian friends will blame this inequality on the government, but that answer is far too simplistic, and not entirely accurate.  The result of labor relations before government involvement was the 1900's, which was the only time in American history where the distribution of wealth was more skewed than it is today.  We know that income inequality has been the downfall of many societies, and given our current course, I see that happening in America in the not-too-distant future.  My first question:  How does Libertarianism address the problem of extreme income inequality?

The second topic is environmental.  Time and again, I hear Libertarians effectively say that they want to get rid of the government.  Heck, a lot of Libertarians want to privatize roads.  The thing is, capitalism does an abysmal job of considering environmental impact when calculating costs.  If we get the government out of environmental enforcement, how do we ensure that future generations will have clean air to breathe and water to drink?  I cannot believe that business will voluntarily do the right thing.  I'm convinced that if left to its own devices, business will take us back to the 1970's environmentally, and then go downhill.  I suspect that you will say that consumers can demand XYZ, and business will make it happen.  However, that assumes that the consumer has realistic alternatives, it assumes that the consumer is always rational, and it assumes that the consumer has the financial means to vote with his dollar.  All of these are inaccurate assumptions.  So... how do Libertarians handle the problem of pollution?

I'd love to hear your thoughts.  Please sound off.