That's it, I've had it! I've had my fill of George W. Bush trying to whittle away my rights. I'm sick of him ramming legislation down our collective throats under the banner of fighting terrorism, and I'm even more disgusted with how the idiots surrounding him blindly parrot the party line and insinuate that people who disagree with the Bush power grab are somehow unpatriotic and trying to coddle terrorists. The most recent example is an Associated Press article I read today, summed up as follows... (My summary, not the author's)
-The House of Representatives recently approved a bill giving President Bush authority to wiretap without a warrant, but with restrictions.
-Though it wasn't directly stated in the article, I have inferred that this bill was passed very much along party lines, with Republicans voting for the measure and Democrats opposing it.
-After passing the bill, Republicans actually called this a test as to whether the Democrats want to fight, or would rather coddle terrorists.
-One legislator basically said that the Democrats were always coming up with excuses why they couldn't support various pieces of legislation and claimed that this speaks volumes about which party is tougher on terror.
Now, after all of this crap, the whole point is made moot, because the bill the House passed won't become law anyway... at least not until after the November elections. Why? Because the Senate and House do not have a united bill to send to the White House. The whole basis of this article was that the House was patting itself on the back through posturing. The House Republicans were trying to make themselves appear tough on terror, and parroting the party propaganda while actually doing nothing.
I'm tired of being silent about this. If I disappear, you will know that it's because what I said was a little too close to home for the Bush Reich.
-Opposing warrantless wiretapping is NOT coddling terrorists.
-Opposing the status quo in Iraq is NOT cutting and running, and it is not coddling terrorists.
-Speaking out against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove and the other Bushies is NOT unpatriotic.
-Trying someone without letting them know what they're being charged with is WRONG.
-Trying someone without letting them see all of the evidence is WRONG.
-Trying someone without letting them face their accusor is WRONG.
-Holding someone indefinitely without reasonable evidence that they did something wrong is WRONG.
-Expecting the people to spend whatever you want on this war, for however long you want, without any justification, cost accounting or fiscal responsibility is WRONG.
Now, by the same token...
-Leaving Iraq now is WRONG. I like Colin Powell's "Pottery Barn" analogy... you break it, you bought it.
-Expecting to fight a war without casualties is WRONG. This is going to sound calloused, but in war there MUST be such a thing as acceptable loss. Our current death toll, while unfortunate, is a very small number.
-Assuming that violence is never the answer, and that negotiations will always yield results is WRONG. That mentality is what allowed the Nazis to march into Paris, and it's why Tibet is now part of China!
-Fighting a war without expecting to have to tighten your belt domestically is WRONG.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment